My cryptic notes from the GLXP team meeting. I believe the slides from this meeting should be posted somewhere.
Notes from the X-Prize meeting 2010-02-01
The Deep Space Network may be available in some fashion through JPL.
News from HQ may be indicative of a major shift (c.o. John Olson)
- New Opportunities
- Focus upon sustainable and affordable
- International focus
- Perhaps a change in international teaming agreements
- Creativity & Innovation
- Bold yet affordable
Google (Tiffany M.)
- Embracing education and exploration
- What is your story
- Work on telling your story
X-Prize (Peter D.)
- This has to be won
- Marketing & education
- Help on creating visibility
- closing the business case
- Possible help from NASA/ESA/JAXA
- Embracing risk and driving innovation
- Effort is potentially world changing/epic/culture change
- Apple/Bell/Cisco of the future
- Radical and entrepreneurial
- Education
- Chandra Gonzales
chandra.gonzales@xprize.orgIsle of Man
- Chris Stot of ISU
- GLXP event in 2010
-
tim.craine@gov.imLMMP - Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project
- ILIADS - beta-release
- NASA vetted access process
- 3D imaging from ARC (stero pairs)
- Constellation sites - lots of homework done on these locations
- send e-mail for access
JPL - Board of experts
- Moonrise mission
- New Frontier mission $650M
- Lunette - seismic measurement mission
- Lessons learned
- Thermal modeling is very important
- MIL spec parts do not cover the temperature extremes for solar system missions
- Good to design things for keep operating range of ~ -20/-30 C
- Astrobotic is the only mission anticipating to survive the night
- Question about regolith reflectivity in radar
- Shorter frequencies have less penetration
- Think about separating altimetry from velocimetry
- Imaging for horizontal velocity estimates
- With good recon (LRO data) can use imaging for altimetry
- LRO ~ 50 cm imaging
- Budget
- Keep 1/3 in reserve (TFN to keep some other fraction)
- Know what documents need to be produced
- Q/A issues are very hard to handle
- Issues of team building
- Good to start without prejudices (wash your bowl)
- Good to 'test the crap' out of everything
- Aspire to 'ship and shoot'
- Avoid testing on the pad
- Thermal vac testing is essential
- Do not short cut the thermal vac and environmental testing
- Focus on mission assurance
- Push for the minimal requirements
- Of course - scope = $$'s
- Need a very good architecture
- Be very hard nose about the design
- due diligence and lessons learned
- Team could be ~ 50 people
- Need to scrub the WBS
- What are the important boxes
- Good to have a second set of eyes on these areas
- Double checking whenever possible
- Testing can be very stressful
- System level testing is more important
- Balance of component vs. system level testing
- Multiple people involved